|
|
Post by Dingley on Sept 24, 2007 22:59:56 GMT 1
Paul Kellerman - 76 (+)
Danny Hale - 57 (-)
|
|
|
|
Post by Audio Pineapple on Sept 25, 2007 10:54:33 GMT 1
Paul Kellerman - 75 [-]
Danny Hale - 58 [+]
|
|
|
|
Post by Dingley on Sept 25, 2007 11:36:33 GMT 1
Paul Kellerman - 76 (+)
Danny Hale - 57 (-)
|
|
|
|
Post by scofield72 on Sept 25, 2007 20:14:13 GMT 1
Paul Kellerman - 77 (+)
Danny Hale - 56 (-)
|
|
|
|
Post by foxtrotbravo on Sept 25, 2007 23:26:03 GMT 1
Paul Kellerman - 76 [-]
Danny Hale - 57 [+]
|
|
|
|
Post by Dingley on Sept 26, 2007 10:48:12 GMT 1
Paul Kellerman - 77 (+)
Danny Hale - 56 (-)
|
|
|
|
Post by scofield72 on Sept 26, 2007 21:15:06 GMT 1
Paul Kellerman - 78 (+)
Danny Hale - 55 (-)
|
|
|
|
Post by foxtrotbravo on Sept 26, 2007 23:11:14 GMT 1
Paul Kellerman - 77 [-]
Danny Hale - 56 [+]
|
|
|
|
Post by Dingley on Sept 27, 2007 8:20:52 GMT 1
Paul Kellerman - 78 (+)
Danny Hale - 55 (-)
Anyone want to reduce these so we just have the 1st number or something? Otherwise this could go on forever! We could just do something like we have done before?
|
|
|
|
Post by Audio Pineapple on Sept 27, 2007 20:26:18 GMT 1
I'm tempted to give up because I know Hale (despite FTB and mine efforts) won't win so I don't really mind.
Paul Kellerman - 77 [-]
Danny Hale - 56 [+]
|
|
|
|
Post by scofield72 on Sept 28, 2007 3:14:27 GMT 1
I think that would be a good idea. This could go on a while!!!
Paul Kellerman - 78 (+)
Danny Hale - 55 (-)
|
|
|
|
Post by rebeccag on Sept 28, 2007 13:41:44 GMT 1
Yeah i agree over the reducing idea too
Paul Kellerman - 79(+)
Danny Hale - 54 (-)
|
|
|
|
Post by Audio Pineapple on Sept 28, 2007 16:39:38 GMT 1
alright then - one more person agrees and they go down to 7 and 5
Paul Kellerman - 78 [-]
Danny Hale - 55 [+]
|
|
|
|
Post by Cute Poison on Sept 28, 2007 18:50:09 GMT 1
I agree!
|
|
|
|
Post by Dingley on Sept 28, 2007 23:58:18 GMT 1
Paul Kellerman - 80(+)
Danny Hale - 53 (-)
|
|
