|
Post by Audio Pineapple on Feb 6, 2007 22:12:47 GMT 1
I've been wondering about this for a couple of weeks now; when T-Bag killed Gudat he said that it could be humane or inhumane - I assume that he thought putting him to sleep was the humane approach but what do you guys recon? Would it have been more humane to do it in a quicker, less sadistic manner (not forgetting the guy was in his boxers at the time of death.)?
And this isn't saying was he right or wrong to kill him - it's the method of killing.
|
|
|
Post by Nickeshi on Feb 7, 2007 17:46:42 GMT 1
I'd have prefered him to do that to me rather than the other things he's capable of
|
|
|
Post by Kiowa Warrior on Feb 7, 2007 18:36:17 GMT 1
For T-Bag that was a humane way of killing, yeah. I think to some extent he didn't want to kill Gudat after what he had saved his hand, but wasn't going to risk him going to the cops.
Gudat was great in that scene, since he managed to maintain a lot of poise and dignity knowing that he was nearly naked and about to be murdered.
|
|
|
Post by Audio Pineapple on Feb 7, 2007 19:12:32 GMT 1
The thing that confuses me is that he didn't seem to want to kill Danni's dad (which it's easily assumed that he did do) because he tried to talk him out of attacking him and therefore having to defend himself.
Maybe he isn't as evil as made out to be.
|
|
Lostie
“…Wish the Hell I Did”
Posts: 192
|
Post by Lostie on Feb 7, 2007 21:11:28 GMT 1
I think it was quite humane, it would be relitavley painless, but I think the fact that he was tied down and only in underwear was inhumane. Maybe it was neccesary for T bag to tie him down, but I don't think he should have made him strip down.
|
|
|
Post by scofield72 on Feb 19, 2007 17:14:12 GMT 1
I thought that it was the worst part up 2 now, although it was a humane way it just wasn't like T-bag and it just seemed quite sick. I mean he's done some sick things but it just didn't seem quite right somehow.
|
|
|
Post by Audio Pineapple on Feb 19, 2007 17:22:11 GMT 1
I wouldn't think it was the worst part up to now - I'd say what he did to Seth/Cherry was worse - the kid ended up hanging himself because he couldn't cope with it but I agree with you that it didn't seem quite right, I think it was the whole "you're with me now" bit, he seemed insane on it.
|
|
|
Post by scofield72 on Feb 20, 2007 20:54:05 GMT 1
Sorry I didn't mean the worst part overall cos T-bag has done some pretty devious and disgusting stuff but it is definitely the worst part out of season 2 up to now.
|
|
|
Post by Audio Pineapple on Feb 20, 2007 21:44:55 GMT 1
ahh of season two - now I getcha lol.
Although I was expecting him to have done something worse to that woman last night... chances are he will do next week.
|
|
|
Post by scofield72 on Feb 21, 2007 14:55:08 GMT 1
I know what you mean, When i saw that smashed glass on the floor i thought she was dead, especially with the way he was eyeing that icepick up. he's still 1 of my fave characters though, after michael and linc of course!!!
|
|
daisyp
Pleading Guilty
Posts: 392
|
Post by daisyp on Feb 21, 2007 17:40:39 GMT 1
None of the others are killers - their reasons for being in Fox River are tame compared to T's. He has the animal instinct of kill or be killed!!
|
|
|
Post by Audio Pineapple on Feb 21, 2007 21:53:25 GMT 1
Abruzzi was in prison for killing. Lincoln was going to kill but it was already done for him. I think it's just that T-Bag revels in his nature where the others try to hide it.
|
|